The U.S. currently spends more than $265 billion annually on unnecessary care. Treatments, tests, and services that — once measured, benchmarked, and analyzed — fall into the category of “potentially harmful, little chance of helping,” That’s simply too costly to sustain. And too wasteful to justify.
Motive’s appropriateness of care measures identify over-treatment and under-treatment with physician attribution and risk adjustment built into the logic. Furthermore, Motive has defined a range of better practice (ROBP) for each measure. These detailed metrics instantly illustrate the suitability of each medical procedure in any clinical process or situation. Our proprietary evidence-based and transparent Appropriate Practice Score (APS) is based on what doctors do and what payers pay. It tells doctors how their clinical decision-making compares to their peers.
Our platform enables you to justify high-value care initiatives because we help you to determine:
Appropriateness: Should services have been provided?
Quality: What was the duration and intensity of appropriate services?
Cost & Efficiency: What is the value of the waste addressed by eliminating inappropriate services?
To build our solutions, we tap into more than 600 board-certified, academically affiliated physicians, nurses, and pharmacists across all therapeutic areas in our network of subject matter experts. These clinical leaders work closely with our informaticists, knowledge engineers, and medical editors. Together, we create the highest-quality and most relevant medical intelligence for outcomes-based care.
